Observations
The most feed efficient program was group 3 with
a feed: gain of 6.63:1. Feed efficiency data from
several recent studies indicates a range from 6
to 8 is to be expected. Although crude protein content
of the rations offered was similar, the energy content
(>80% corn) of the ration offered group 3 was
significantly higher than that of the other groups.
The ration for group 3 was originally designed
as a mixture of approximately 80% whole shelled
corn, 20% 3/16 inch pellet. However, after one wk
on feed, it became apparent the goats were sorting
the feed, consuming the corn and wasting the pellet.
Therefore, the corn and pellet were ground together
to result in a more homogenous ration.
A similar problem was observed with the textured
feed offered group 2. Therefore, if goats are to
be selffed, these authors strongly recommend pelleting
the feed to be offered. If textured feed is to be
used, producers might consider feeding twice daily
as is done in commercial cattle feeding operations.
The cost of labor and equipment must be weighed
against the expense of wasted feed to determine
the most cost effective approach.
The self-limiting pellet offered groups 4 and 5
was formulated according to experience with cattle
and deer. In this trial, the limiting mechanism
was not effective in holding goats to the same 1.5%
BW observed in other species. Group 4 exhibited
the highest cost of gain, primarily due to the additional
cost of the hay.
The cost of gain data in Table 2 does not include
consideration of labor, overhead expenses or interest
on operating capital. It appears that successful
goat feeding operations must include a feed cost
of gain no higher than 50-55¢ per/lb of gain,
which translates into a ration cost of less than
$130 per ton.
The marketing of fed goats should be thoroughly
investigated before beginning a feeding program,
especially if the out weight of the fed goats will
exceed 80 lbs (36 kg).
